<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Circumventing parental controls is trivial - a suggestion in Broadband &amp; Landline</title>
    <link>https://community.ee.co.uk/t5/Broadband-Landline/Circumventing-parental-controls-is-trivial-a-suggestion/m-p/1524185#M118297</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;When you set up parental controls you specify a device (or devices) in a group then apply a schedule to that group for when access should be allowed or disallowed according to a time "window".&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This seems fine until you realise that the underlying mechanism relies on the MAC address(es) of the device(s) that you add to the group.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Changing the MAC address of a device in such a group is very easy - especially if the device is running Windows. Thus, by making that change, the router doesn't "see" that device as one that should be scheduled as intended.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The configuration mechanism needs to be enhanced such that one can say disable ALL devices that are not known in a well-defined list. This would mean that one could specify those items that need 24/7 wireless/internet access (e.g., an alarm system, smart thermostat, etc.).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In other words one should be able to set up those devices that ARE allowed full access rather than specify those that are NOT allowed access according to some schedule&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2025 09:44:20 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>SIGHUP</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-04-10T09:44:20Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Circumventing parental controls is trivial - a suggestion</title>
      <link>https://community.ee.co.uk/t5/Broadband-Landline/Circumventing-parental-controls-is-trivial-a-suggestion/m-p/1524185#M118297</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;When you set up parental controls you specify a device (or devices) in a group then apply a schedule to that group for when access should be allowed or disallowed according to a time "window".&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This seems fine until you realise that the underlying mechanism relies on the MAC address(es) of the device(s) that you add to the group.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Changing the MAC address of a device in such a group is very easy - especially if the device is running Windows. Thus, by making that change, the router doesn't "see" that device as one that should be scheduled as intended.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The configuration mechanism needs to be enhanced such that one can say disable ALL devices that are not known in a well-defined list. This would mean that one could specify those items that need 24/7 wireless/internet access (e.g., an alarm system, smart thermostat, etc.).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In other words one should be able to set up those devices that ARE allowed full access rather than specify those that are NOT allowed access according to some schedule&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2025 09:44:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ee.co.uk/t5/Broadband-Landline/Circumventing-parental-controls-is-trivial-a-suggestion/m-p/1524185#M118297</guid>
      <dc:creator>SIGHUP</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-04-10T09:44:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

