<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Confusion re poor signal in Mobile Network discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.ee.co.uk/t5/Mobile-Network-discussions/Confusion-re-poor-signal/m-p/1447652#M38001</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;NetMonster shows band 20 but no stronger hence not used.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can I or EE do anything to help here or do I have to change network if I want a usable signal indoors?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2024 17:01:36 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>henryb1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-09-27T17:01:36Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Confusion re poor signal</title>
      <link>https://community.ee.co.uk/t5/Mobile-Network-discussions/Confusion-re-poor-signal/m-p/1447598#M37997</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;At my home location in Hanwell in W London, the coverage checker shows Excellent 4G and 2G signal indoors and out. (I know there are many reasons why it could be wrong.)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The odd thing is that for 1800MHz 2G signal, I would say that broadly speaking it is correct - the signal is good (RXL/RSSI = -87dBm).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However for 4G (on band 3 - also 1800MHz) signal is terrible (RSRP = -117dBm).&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I see this pattern across much of the surrounding area (within a mile or two).&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Given the same frequency I would have expected more similar propagation. That said, I understand I am assuming the same mast location, antenna angle, etc, and that might be inappropriate.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any thoughts on:&lt;BR /&gt;a) Do folk agree this is odd / what am I missing?&lt;BR /&gt;b) Can anything be done to improve the 4G signal (by me or by EE)?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In general, the online coverage tool projection has it terribly wrong for 4G &amp;amp; 5G in this area.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2024 16:00:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ee.co.uk/t5/Mobile-Network-discussions/Confusion-re-poor-signal/m-p/1447598#M37997</guid>
      <dc:creator>henryb1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-09-27T16:00:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Confusion re poor signal</title>
      <link>https://community.ee.co.uk/t5/Mobile-Network-discussions/Confusion-re-poor-signal/m-p/1447639#M38000</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Both 2G &amp;amp; 4G on 1800Mhz are generally rigged to the same antenna and radio module - but the power levels are set independently. EE's network design is such that 2G1800 always has to exceed the coverage levels of 4G1800 to allow for CSFB on non-VoLTE phones.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Two of the serving sites in this area also carry 4G800Mhz, and it's possible the online coverage map could be factoring this.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2024 16:33:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ee.co.uk/t5/Mobile-Network-discussions/Confusion-re-poor-signal/m-p/1447639#M38000</guid>
      <dc:creator>bristolian</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-09-27T16:33:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Confusion re poor signal</title>
      <link>https://community.ee.co.uk/t5/Mobile-Network-discussions/Confusion-re-poor-signal/m-p/1447652#M38001</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;NetMonster shows band 20 but no stronger hence not used.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can I or EE do anything to help here or do I have to change network if I want a usable signal indoors?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2024 17:01:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ee.co.uk/t5/Mobile-Network-discussions/Confusion-re-poor-signal/m-p/1447652#M38001</guid>
      <dc:creator>henryb1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-09-27T17:01:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Confusion re poor signal</title>
      <link>https://community.ee.co.uk/t5/Mobile-Network-discussions/Confusion-re-poor-signal/m-p/1447673#M38002</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Easy solutions for improving RX levels are the panacea for 100% national indoor coverage - a lovely idea but unrealistic in practice. Hence WiFi-calling being the recommended solution.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Some phones are better at handling fringe coverage levels than others.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2024 17:37:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ee.co.uk/t5/Mobile-Network-discussions/Confusion-re-poor-signal/m-p/1447673#M38002</guid>
      <dc:creator>bristolian</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-09-27T17:37:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

