<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Re: Coverage Checker not accurate, infact a bit of a lie!? in Mobile Network discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.ee.co.uk/t5/Mobile-Network-discussions/Re-Coverage-Checker-not-accurate-infact-a-bit-of-a-lie/m-p/1340126#M31750</link>
    <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.ee.co.uk/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1437232"&gt;@Doge&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The coverage checker is a data model and does not factor in terrain or buildings&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;All radio networks use similar modelling, and terrain is a factor.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;There are a couple of notable crowd-sourced coverage tools, OpenSignal is one.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2023 12:11:12 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>bristolian</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-12-21T12:11:12Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Coverage Checker not accurate, infact a bit of a lie!?</title>
      <link>https://community.ee.co.uk/t5/Mobile-Network-discussions/Re-Coverage-Checker-not-accurate-infact-a-bit-of-a-lie/m-p/1339963#M31740</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It’s happening with me everyday in zone 1 areas in London, and when I go to network checker it says that the 5g signal is good. It’s even hard to use google maps or social media. So bad&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2023 20:40:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ee.co.uk/t5/Mobile-Network-discussions/Re-Coverage-Checker-not-accurate-infact-a-bit-of-a-lie/m-p/1339963#M31740</guid>
      <dc:creator>Yehya</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-12-20T20:40:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Re: Coverage Checker not accurate, infact a bit of a lie!?</title>
      <link>https://community.ee.co.uk/t5/Mobile-Network-discussions/Re-Coverage-Checker-not-accurate-infact-a-bit-of-a-lie/m-p/1339971#M31741</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;What is the issue you're having?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2023 20:53:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ee.co.uk/t5/Mobile-Network-discussions/Re-Coverage-Checker-not-accurate-infact-a-bit-of-a-lie/m-p/1339971#M31741</guid>
      <dc:creator>bristolian</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-12-20T20:53:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Re: Coverage Checker not accurate, infact a bit of a lie!?</title>
      <link>https://community.ee.co.uk/t5/Mobile-Network-discussions/Re-Coverage-Checker-not-accurate-infact-a-bit-of-a-lie/m-p/1340120#M31746</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The coverage checker is a data model and does not factor in terrain or buildings so in a city like London it would be wrong. Try OpenSignal app as it uses real data submitted by users&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2023 12:03:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ee.co.uk/t5/Mobile-Network-discussions/Re-Coverage-Checker-not-accurate-infact-a-bit-of-a-lie/m-p/1340120#M31746</guid>
      <dc:creator>Doge</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-12-21T12:03:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Re: Coverage Checker not accurate, infact a bit of a lie!?</title>
      <link>https://community.ee.co.uk/t5/Mobile-Network-discussions/Re-Coverage-Checker-not-accurate-infact-a-bit-of-a-lie/m-p/1340126#M31750</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.ee.co.uk/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/1437232"&gt;@Doge&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The coverage checker is a data model and does not factor in terrain or buildings&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;All radio networks use similar modelling, and terrain is a factor.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;There are a couple of notable crowd-sourced coverage tools, OpenSignal is one.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2023 12:11:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.ee.co.uk/t5/Mobile-Network-discussions/Re-Coverage-Checker-not-accurate-infact-a-bit-of-a-lie/m-p/1340126#M31750</guid>
      <dc:creator>bristolian</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-12-21T12:11:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

