https://community.ee.co.uk/t5/Mobile-Services/Re-Signal-in-the-London-tube/m-p/1382621#M41214 <P>What I said is correct. &nbsp; It doesn’t matter if the other operators are bad. &nbsp; The signal problems still need to be resolved.</P> Tue, 30 Apr 2024 20:54:11 GMT uvarvu 2024-04-30T20:54:11Z https://community.ee.co.uk/t5/Mobile-Services/Re-Signal-in-the-London-tube/m-p/1382606#M41212 <P>Forget the tube, the EE signal is rubbish on national rail as well.</P><P><A href="https://mastdatabase.co.uk/gb/railway-coverage-notspots/" target="_blank">https://mastdatabase.co.uk/gb/railway-coverage-notspots/</A></P><P>&nbsp;</P><P>Time to sort this out please.</P> Tue, 30 Apr 2024 20:07:06 GMT https://community.ee.co.uk/t5/Mobile-Services/Re-Signal-in-the-London-tube/m-p/1382606#M41212 uvarvu 2024-04-30T20:07:06Z https://community.ee.co.uk/t5/Mobile-Services/Re-Signal-in-the-London-tube/m-p/1382614#M41213 <P>Saying a particular operator is "rubbish on National Rail" is equivalent to saying an operator is "poor on motorways".</P> <P>I note from your link that there is a prominent disclaimer - "We note that EE appears to provide the most realistic coverage estimations on their maps, so appear to have more "not-spots" than other networks, but it is likely the other networks would perform similarly if real-world testing was performed."</P> Tue, 30 Apr 2024 20:23:10 GMT https://community.ee.co.uk/t5/Mobile-Services/Re-Signal-in-the-London-tube/m-p/1382614#M41213 bristolian 2024-04-30T20:23:10Z https://community.ee.co.uk/t5/Mobile-Services/Re-Signal-in-the-London-tube/m-p/1382621#M41214 <P>What I said is correct. &nbsp; It doesn’t matter if the other operators are bad. &nbsp; The signal problems still need to be resolved.</P> Tue, 30 Apr 2024 20:54:11 GMT https://community.ee.co.uk/t5/Mobile-Services/Re-Signal-in-the-London-tube/m-p/1382621#M41214 uvarvu 2024-04-30T20:54:11Z